Saturday, July 31st, 2010

The 3rd “Space archeology”

0

al003I mentioned it in the last lecture that there are many kind of genres in archeology.
The method to research form historical sites, excavated articles and documents is generally considered archeology. There are many other archeology researched from various things.

 

The historical sites still existing on the surface are just parts and some of sites have sunk into the sea during ancient times.
So, we can consider that hidden things are in the sea covered with 70% of the earth. That’s the marine archaeology.
The other archeology infers the environment of ancient time by examining earthquakes and change of natural.
That’s called the earthquake archaeology or the environmental archaeology.
Furthermore, because of development of the space technology, some objects which can’t be seen on the ground have discovered with looking at the surface of the earth from space.
This is the space archaeology. Nazca Lines have been recognized by airplanes. There was a talk that a revised structure in a satellite photograph from Google Earth is said to be the vestige of Atlantis civilization.

 

This time, I’ll lecture about the space archaeology. But there is an other space archeology which is advanced one more step.
Though influenced by Nazca Lines, it mentioned the existence of aliens. Because of the question as to why those objects can’t be seen without looking from the sky, there is the theory that aliens built the ancient civilizations.

 

These theories are regarded as irregular in academic circles. However, these have an attractiveness that is difficult to just throw out as a mistake.
It’s easy to say that huge structures like the Pyramid were built by aliens’ unknown force. We don’t know how they were made.
So, you could give up researching the solution of mysterious aliens, but we can’t say that too easily because some proof does exist.

 

To say proof, most of these are imagined since modern people think in a linear manner. For example, a famous one is Shakouki-Dogu unearthed from Japanese soil.
This is an incomprehensible shape to the imitation of mankind.
An astronaut of the former Soviet Union saw the Dogu and said, “it looks almost exactly apollo suit’s architecture.”
On the other hand, the statue which imitates a person (that of one who rides on something like a rocket) was found in Turkey. Something like a spacecraft is drawn on the lid of stone coffin of the Palenque ruins.

 

But, It’s too rough to insist that these theories are evidence is proof of aliens. Especially the coffin of Palenque, it looks like, “the lying king underneath a tree of life” by changing the angle to see. This theory is rather convincing.

 

Well, I want to say a mountain of things about Palenque, but I’ll keep it for another lecture.

 

About Palenque’s case, it’s like someone is handling a spacecraft in an angle that is can be seen in a horizontal position.
I want to say “sit down without lying” against lying king by seeing vertical angle.
Both theories are modern people’s imaginations.
Of course, both theories have an interpretation and an explanation that seems very reasonable.

 

The theories are so strong that almost of those objects, Shakouki-Dogu, rocket statue and many other remains associate with aliens, don’t related with space. Those objects which can’t be match time-line or existing theory are called OOPARTS, as irregular.

 

I also want to say a mountain of things about OOPARTS. The mystery couldn’t be solved without bringing it into a suitable place, but in the laboratory. I’ll keep it for the rest of lecture, too.

 

Anyway, I’m not willing to use such a stereotypical word such as alien, but I’m certain of the theory that extra-terrestrial life was involved in forming the oldest civilization in the world.
I’d rather say I had actually seen the material proof which could be turned over to academics, but I’m afraid the ruin collapsed just as I had escaped from it.

 

Let me repeat that lectures after this are dependent on what my family’s experiences and imagination, which we led to with researching.

 

Lemeza Kosugi

Comments are closed.